Bagi editor jurnal tertentu mereka sentiasa
memberi peluang kedua walaupun penilai2 kata ‘major revision’.
“I am pleased to inform you that your
manuscript has received a positive review. Unfortunately, the manuscript is not
acceptable for publication in the Journal XYZ in its present form. However, the
reviewers have suggested major revisions which may render the work suitable for
publication.
If you are willing and able to respond to each
of the reviewers' critical comments, we would consider a revised manuscript.
Please submit within the next four weeks a separate list of changes and/or
rebuttal comments reflecting each of the issues raised by the reviewers.”
In addition, please highlight or underline the
changes made within the revised article file. A courtesy e-mail may be sent to
you as the four weeks approach to remind you of the deadline. It may be
necessary to send your manuscript for another review depending on your response
to the reviewers' comments and the changes that you make. Feel free to go to
the URL below to login and then submit the revised manuscript, including figures.
Sini kita boleh lihat editor minta kita jawap
satu per satu (to respond to each of the reviewers' critical comments).
So tugas kita selepas ini ialah:
1. Fikir rangka jawapan (tak perlu tulis lagi)
tentang kemungkinan jawapannya.
2. Cuba imbas (igatkan kembali) mana2 jurnal
yang boleh digunakan utk menjawap soalan2 tersebut. Banyak membaca banyak
ingat!.
".... rasanya aku pernah jumpa jurnal
bincang benda ni..."
3. Jika kita tidak juga mampu menjawap soalan
tersebut, cuba berbincang dengan kawan2 atau cuba emailkan soalan kepada
kenalan peer anda.
Yang tinggal sekarang ialah menulis format
jawapan.
(first entry using ipad2... very good device for blogger)
No comments:
Post a Comment